Regulatory framework

Safeguarding for payment and e-money firms

Safeguarding is the requirement for payment institutions (PIs) and electronic money institutions (EMIs) to protect the funds they hold on behalf of customers. The rules ensure that, if a firm becomes insolvent, customer funds can be identified, separated from the firm’s own assets, and returned quickly. In the UK, safeguarding obligations are set out in the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (PSR 2017) and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 (EMR 2011), and from 7 May 2026 under the new consolidated regime introduced through CASS 15 of the FCA Handbook.

Who safeguarding applies to

Safeguarding requirements apply to all authorised payment institutions and authorised electronic money institutions operating in the UK. Small e-money institutions are also within scope. The rules apply whenever a firm holds funds received from payment service users in connection with a payment transaction, or funds received in exchange for electronic money issued by the firm. Firms must implement and maintain safeguarding arrangements from the point they begin holding relevant funds.

How safeguarding works

Firms have two main approaches to safeguarding available to them:

  • Segregation method

    Relevant funds must be held in a designated safeguarding account with an authorised credit institution, or invested in secure, liquid assets such as qualifying money market instruments or government bonds held in a separate account. The funds must be kept separate from the firm’s own money at all times.

  • Insurance or guarantee method

    As an alternative to segregation, firms can cover relevant funds with an insurance policy or guarantee from an authorised insurer. The policy or guarantee must be for an appropriate amount, held independently of the firm, and accessible to customers in the event of insolvency.

The new regime: CASS 15 (effective 7 May 2026)

The FCA’s Policy Statement PS25/12 introduces a consolidated safeguarding regime embedded in CASS 15 of the FCA Handbook. The new rules replace the safeguarding provisions currently set out in the PSR 2017 and EMR 2011 and significantly raise the standard expected of firms. Key changes are summarised below.

  • Daily reconciliations

    Firms must perform both internal and external safeguarding reconciliations on every reconciliation day (excluding weekends, UK bank holidays, and days when relevant foreign markets are closed). Reconciliations must follow a documented and consistent methodology, cover all relevant funds and accounts, and be completed to a D+1 standard. The FCA expects firms to evidence the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of their reconciliation processes.

  • Annual safeguarding audit

    Firms that have safeguarded above £100,000 at any point over a rolling 53-week period must arrange an annual independent safeguarding audit with a statutory auditor. The audit must assess two things: whether the firm maintained adequate safeguarding systems throughout the audit period, and whether it was compliant at the period end. The first audit report must be submitted to the FCA within six months of the period end. For subsequent years, the deadline is four months.

  • Monthly regulatory returns

    Firms must submit a monthly safeguarding return to the FCA within 15 business days of each month end. The return covers the total safeguarding requirement, the method or methods used, reconciliation results, any shortfalls and their rectification, all breaches during the period, and details of safeguarding accounts, assets, and insurance or guarantee arrangements.

  • Resolution pack

    Firms must maintain a resolution pack — a living document that links to the firm’s current reconciliations, safeguarding account contracts, acknowledgement letters, and account information. The pack must be structured so that an insolvency practitioner can quickly identify and access relevant funds without relying on key personnel or internal systems.

  • Third-party and outsourcing oversight

    Firms that have safeguarded above £100,000 at any point over a rolling 53-week period must arrange an annual independent safeguarding audit with a statutory auditor. The audit must assess two things: whether the firm maintained adequate safeguarding systems throughout the audit period, and whether it was compliant at the period end. The first audit report must be submitted to the FCA within six months of the period end. For subsequent years, the deadline is four months.

FRC assurance guidance (March 2026)

The Financial Reporting Council published interim guidance in March 2026 on safeguarding assurance engagements. The guidance aligns the audit methodology with principles from the FCA’s CASS Assurance Standard and introduces a more structured, controls-based approach to how safeguarding is audited.

Key developments from the FRC guidance include:

  • A dual focus on both the adequacy of systems throughout the period and compliance at the period end
  • Assessment of the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of safeguarding controls
  • Explicit inclusion of IT General Controls in the audit scope — firms must identify key systems, demonstrate control effectiveness, and be prepared for IT-related audit procedures
  • Mandatory breach logging with no materiality threshold — all breaches must be captured, tracked, evidenced, and remediated
  • Higher expectations for documentation, evidence quality, and audit traceability
  • Increased scrutiny of outsourcing arrangements and third-party reliance

The guidance also recognises that the transition period from May 2026 to May 2027 involves overlap between the legacy safeguarding rules and the new CASS 15 framework. Firms may need to demonstrate compliance with both sets of requirements during this period.

Common compliance challenges

In practice, many PIs and EMIs face similar difficulties in meeting safeguarding requirements:

  • Reliance on spreadsheets for daily reconciliations, which introduce manual error, version control risk, and a lack of audit trail
  • Inconsistent reconciliation methodologies, particularly across multiple products, safeguarding banks, or agent and distributor models
  • Weak documentation — controls may exist in practice, but firms cannot easily evidence them for auditors
  • Limited capacity to produce audit-ready data on demand, leading to significant disruption during audit
  • Governance gaps between operational teams carrying out reconciliations and senior management providing oversight
  • Insufficient breach logging and exception management, particularly in light of the FRC’s no-materiality-threshold requirement

Need help meeting the May 2026 safeguarding requirements?

We provide automated reconciliation, managed oversight, gap reviews, and a full audit readiness programme through our Macrobank platform.

Schedule a 30 min call with us